Creationism vs carbon 14 dating

, and things never really improve much through its nine paragraphs.The question itself is a complete nonsense, as no one except creationists ever mention carbon-14 dating and the age of the Earth as being related topics.

creationism vs carbon 14 dating-37creationism vs carbon 14 dating-55creationism vs carbon 14 dating-7

Any scientist with an open mind would tell you that if these assumptions were shifted towards a Biblical view, the carbon dating process would still work, though at a much shorter time scale.

Carbon 14 (C-14) dating was considered to be a tremendous breakthrough in science when Willard Libby devised it in 1946. Read, Journal of Near Eastern Studies, Vol, 29, No. Thus, the meaning of dates by C-14 prior to 1600 B. "If the earth and life on earth are really as ancient as the theory of evolution requires, a great proportion of radiocarbon ages should be infinite.

But subsequent investigations have revealed it to be wholly inadequate for accurate dating of ancient materials. evolution—a Creation-Evolution Encyclopedia, brought to you by Creation Science Facts. This is because, with a half-life of only 5,730 years, initial radiocarbon in a fossil decreases in about ten half-lives to a level too low to be measured."—Robert E.

There are two major assumptions that are impossible to prove or disprove. Based upon the Big Bang theory as well as the theory of evolution, most scientists (and therefore the general public) believe that the universe and the world are billions of years old.

This assumption allows for C in the environment is mostly constant.

Leave a Reply